I think we have two processors; in a way. One is high randomness low speed and the other is high speed low randomness. Your adhd and your autism. Your tiger and your maze. I think your maze is curated while you sleep, and the tiger is released in the morning. Maybe I'm not sleeping much because my maze feels curated right now? All relative I suppose.
Each day the tiger roams and the tamer learns. The tamer tailors the maze, and the tiger plays ball, or not, and the tamer learns.
So the tamer is the AI and the tiger is the rng?
We need logic to have near-zero rng because quantum fluctuations are near negligible.
So…
Tiger is waiting. asd has tailored the cage.
The tiger is a program running on a platform? Adhd on top of asd? Or are they equal?
I think asd has a deeper place than adhd in adults. It is inherently less volatile because it is hardware. So the autoencoder loop could be something like:
Asd output -> adhd input
+ rng = asd input
+ rules = adhd input
+ rng = asd input
+ rules = adhd input
It seems like human learning and adaptation could almost be summarised this way.
So the neurones are mush at the start and the emotions are king. Give me mother. This would mean that the adhd is in charge at the outset. So there is usually a tipping point where the asd becomes more powerful and the emotions calm down, but I think this does not occur in the adhd brain. I think people just learn coping strategies and how to hide things, instead of actually ‘growing up’. Sorry guys; I’m one of you. You have to know the problem to fix it.
So do we have 2 stages in the processing: one where asd is soft and the other where it’s hard. So we need malleability as a data point and this needs to change as age progresses.
At the outset 1 processor: emotion.
This shapes the processor of asd.
Which then takes control and gets the PFC to dampen emotion pre-cognition.
Maybe.
202507040550
Add: This fits the observations from the start of this journey about going all the way to god.